OS. No.1049/2019

Case between Amarnath vs Dr. Viswakumar et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court

COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III

Judge

Smt.Sreelakshmi.C

Order Date

2025-08-05

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Amarnath is the plaintiff who has brought a suit against Dr. Viswakumar and others. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff was absent and did not have any representation.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence resulted in dismissal of the suit.

Why Defendant Won:
Not available

Supporting Evidence

The plaintiff was absent and no representation was made.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit stands dismissed. Pronounced in open court on this the 5th day of August 2025.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Amarnath
Party Age: 68
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Dr.Viswakumar
Party Age: 77
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Savithri Vipin
Party Age: 42
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Lekshmi Thampi
Party Age: 40
Relation: D/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. Shoby Joseph.Y.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. Cherunniyoor P.Sasidharan Nair
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri.DilMohan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.

Evidence:

As plaintiff is absent and no representation is made. Suit stands dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification