Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 63/2025

Case between ALI HAJI KAMMANAKUNNU vs THALIYIL SALEENA regarding realization of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-07-01
Duration
approximately-1 year 11 months
Case Closed
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, ALI HAJI KAMMANAKUNNU, and the defendant, THALIYIL SALEENA, are friends. The plaintiff lent the defendant Rs.1,50,000/- due to her financial difficulties, but the defendant has only repaid part of the amount.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing him to recover Rs.1,25,000/- from the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
An amount of Rs.1,25,000/- from the defendant and her assets
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing him to recover Rs.1,25,000/- from the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The claim of the plaintiff to realize the amount stands undisputed and unrebutted.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The claim of the plaintiff to realize the amount stands undisputed and unrebutted.
Supporting Evidence
On a perusal of plaint, proof affidavit and documents the claim of the plaintiff to realize the plaint amount from the defendant stands undisputed and unrebutted.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
ALI HAJI KAMMANAKUNNU
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
THALIYIL SALEENA
Party Age
40
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
A1:16.09.2023:Agreement written in paper executed by the defendant in favour of plaintiff, A2:21.08.2024:Copy of Lawyer Notice sent by Adv. N. M. Rajagopal to the defendant with postal receipt, A3:23.08.2024:Postal Acknowledgment Card signed by the defendant.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
N. M. Rajagopal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.1,25,000/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed with costs as follows: The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.1,25,000/- from the defendant and her assets from the date of suit till date of realization with costs from the defendant and her assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement written in paper executed by the defendant in favour of plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of Lawyer Notice sent by Adv. N. M. Rajagopal to the defendant with postal receipt.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal Acknowledgment Card signed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Loan Recovery
Case Code
Case between ALI HAJI KAMMANAKUNNU vs THALIYIL SALEENA regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between ALI HAJI KAMMANAKUNNU vs THALIYIL SALEENA regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Nadapuram
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Mon, 08/14/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs MOLLY regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between CANARA BANK vs JAGATH CHANDRAN et al regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs MAREENA JOHNY, JOHNY. O. P regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between MANAGER, CANARA BANK, KUTTIADI BRANCH vs RATHEESH. K regarding realization of money.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between CANARA BANK, KUTTIADY BRANCH vs AKHIL . P. T et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won