ORIGINAL SUIT No. 213 OF 2015

Case between Abdul Rasheed vs Koyamon et al regarding injunction

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR

Judge

Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN

Order Date

2019-10-09

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Abdul Rasheed is the plaintiff in this case against Koyamon and others regarding an injunction. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Injunction

Final Judgment

The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent during the hearing.

Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent during the hearing.

Supporting Evidence

Counsel for plaintiff reported no instruction. Plaintiff's name called absent.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Abdul Rasheed
Party Age: 39
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Koyamon
Party Age: 50
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Navas
Party Age: 45
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Basheer
Party Age: 40
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Fathima Beevi
Party Age: 55
Relation: W/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. V.Chandrsekharan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri.Vipin.K.
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: M.A.M.Rafeekh
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri.K.C.Naseer
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri.K.P.Saidalavi
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction

Outcome: Rejected

Description:

The plaintiff sought an injunction.

Evidence:

Suit is one for injunction.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification