OS. No.1657/2017

Case between Abdul Kalam.S et al vs Vijayan regarding suit dismissal for default

Court

IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF

Judge

Sri.Mithun Gopi.G.S

Order Date

2025-06-02

Duration

Case Closed

Mon, 06/02/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs Abdul Kalam, Lekshmanan, Maniyan, and Biju are involved in a suit against defendant Vijayan. The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiffs and their lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiffs were not present and did not have any representation.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs failed to appear and represent their case.

Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs failed to appear and represent their case.

Supporting Evidence

Since, the plaintiff is neither present nor represented, the suit is dismissed for default.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is dismissed for default. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Abdul Kalam.S
Party Age: 50
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Lekshmanan
Party Age: 67
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Maniyan
Party Age: 55
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Biju
Party Age: 38
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Vijayan
Party Age: 50
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. B.S. Sankarlal
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. Rajesh Raveendran
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri.K.Nagendran
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.

Evidence:

the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification