Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R C P No.129/2018

Case between A.Ayyappan vs Sasikumar regarding Rent Control Petition

Court
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Judge
Smt. Meera John.K
Order Date
2025-02-18
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

A.Ayyappan filed a petition against Sasikumar for non-payment of rent. The petitioner requires the premises for conducting a tailoring shop.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition and directed the respondent to vacate the premises. The petitioner was also granted costs of the proceedings.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule room within two months.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition and directed the respondent to vacate the premises. The petitioner was also granted costs of the proceedings.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged evidence proved the case of the petitioner.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unchallenged evidence proved the case of the petitioner.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff who was examined as PW1 had deposed in tune with the petition averments. The unchallenged evidence of PW1 coupled with Exts.A1 to A12 proves the case of the petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, Rent Control Petition is allowed under Section 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Act as follows: 1) Respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule room within two months from the date of this order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
A.Ayyappan
Party Age
74
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sasikumar
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Lease agreement executed between petitioner and respondent, Copy of lawyer notice, Postal Receipt, Acknowledgment card, Reply notice, Licence agreement executed between petitioner and respondent.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.K.Valsalakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv. K.M.Musthafa
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V.G.Neena
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule room within two months.
Evidence:
In the result, Rent Control Petition is allowed under Section 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Act as follows: Respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule room within two months from the date of this order.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner is entitled to recover the costs of the rent control proceedings from the respondent.
Evidence:
Petitioner is also entitled to recover the costs of the rent control proceedings from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lease Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides the initial rental terms agreed upon by the petitioner and respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice informed the respondent about the outstanding rent and the need for the petitioner to reclaim possession.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof of sending the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This card confirms the receipt of the lawyer notice by the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice contains the respondent's response, although it was characterized by false contentions.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Licence agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This agreement outlines additional business arrangements between the petitioner and respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: VAT Registration certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document evidences the petitioner's business operations.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Licence agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This is a subsequent licence agreement executed by the petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Receipt of licence fee
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This receipt verifies the payment of licence fees to the local panchayat.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Advertisement notice of shop
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice is intended for publicizing the shop's offerings.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Advertisement notice of shop
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This is another notice for advertising purposes related to the shop.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This report provided factual findings relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Commissioner’s sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This sketch illustrates the property's layout relevant to the occupancy dispute.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between A.Ayyappan vs Sasikumar regarding Rent Control Petition
Case Code Year
Case between A.Ayyappan vs Sasikumar regarding Rent Control Petition

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between C.Jayaraj Panicker et al vs M.P.Mujeeb Rahman regarding eviction and rent arrears
Rent Control Court/Additional Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Devasya vs V. K.Sasi regarding eviction from shop room
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Pandikasala Vahija et al vs Musthafa Alungal regarding eviction from shop rooms
Rent Control Court/Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Pandikasala Sabira et al vs Hashim Thangal regarding eviction from shop room
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Pandikasala Vahija et al vs Musthafa Alungal regarding eviction.
Rent Control Court/Munsiff-II
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won