Case Summary
Aabylal.A, the plaintiff, was absent during the proceedings, while Nirmal.K.George, the defendant, was represented. The court ultimately dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit since the plaintiff was absent and no representation was made.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence and lack of representation justified the dismissal of the case.
The plaintiff's absence and lack of representation justified the dismissal of the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's absence and lack of representation justified the dismissal of the case.
The plaintiff's absence and lack of representation justified the dismissal of the case.
Supporting Evidence
As plaintiff is absent and no representation is made I find no reason to proceed with the suit.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Aabylal.A
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nirmal.K.George
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Rakesh Thampan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. G.S.Rajeev Chempakassery
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Aabylal.A vs Nirmal.K.George regarding suit dismissal
Case Code Year
Case between Aabylal.A vs Nirmal.K.George regarding suit dismissal