Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 1121 - 1125 of 3413

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Muhammad Sakeer vs Sreeram Transport Company Limited regarding petition for disposal on merit

Petition for Disposal on Merit

Restor. 2059/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-11-04

0 years, 2 months, 13 days

Petitioner

View Full Details

Case between Kadeeja et al vs Aboobacker et al regarding division of property for partition

Civil Suit - Partition

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.2808 OF 2015

Tirur

2017-11-03

5 years 4 months 12 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kunnamkulam Financing Company Ltd. vs Suresh Babu regarding payment of debt

Civil Suit - Debt Recovery

EP 378/2015

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-11-03

2 years, 0 months, 28 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Puthan Veettil Shaji vs Poolakkal Muhammed et al regarding tenancy dispute

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 19 OF 2017

Tirur

2017-11-01

Not mentioned

Dismissed

View Full Details

Case between Puliyasseri Kumaran's daughter Sheeba and Hidayathulla regarding rent arrears settlement

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 57 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-11-01

1 year and 1 day

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

48%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 3,413 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 81 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 80 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 65 cases)
Tax receipt (in 54 cases)
Agreement (in 53 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1646
Defendant Won: 1104

1104

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

24%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay the required batta, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Insufficient evidence regarding respondents' means to pay debts resulted in dismissals.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Plaintiffs often did not take necessary legal steps, including issuing notices.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Absent Plaintiffs or Petitioners

Frequent absenteeism of plaintiffs/petitioners resulted in immediate case dismissals.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Required Steps

Absent Plaintiffs or Petitioners

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?