Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 1101 - 1105 of 4243

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Pullippatt Muhammedkutty et al vs Basheer Moopan regarding Suit for realisation of money

Unknown

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 377 OF 2017

Tirur

2019-11-11

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Secratary vs Sharji Kummarambil et al regarding decree

Execution Petition

EP 316/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-11-08

0 years, 10 months, 27 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Kadeeja et al vs Usmankutty.K.P et al regarding Injunction

Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 102 OF 2015

2019-11-05

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Ibrahim et al vs Saidalikkutty regarding fixation of boundary and perpetual injunction

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 441 OF 2013

Tirur

2019-11-05

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Muhammed Ashraf et al vs Musthafa regarding money

Money Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 80 OF 2018

2019-11-05

Unknown

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

42%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 4,243 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 126 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 99 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 83 cases)
Commission Plan (in 79 cases)
Tax receipt (in 70 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1779
Defendant Won: 1249

1249

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

20%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary fees for court processes, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Many petitions were dismissed for failure to present sufficient evidence regarding the means of the respondents.

Found in 19 cases (19%) High Impact

Absence of Petitioners in Court

Cases were often dismissed when the petitioners failed to appear at the scheduled hearings.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Plaintiffs often did not take required procedural steps, resulting in the dismissal of their petitions.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Provided

Absence of Petitioners in Court

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?