Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 1011 - 1015 of 4243

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Secratary vs Abdu Rehiman.C et al regarding Debt Recovery

Debt Recovery

EP 193/2019

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-11-18

0 years, 5 months, 1 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt. Ltd vs Mohammed Faisal. P.K regarding U/s 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act

Criminal Case

S.T. No:41/2016

Tirur

2019-11-18

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Amina T. et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 195 OF 2019

TIRUR

2019-11-15

3 years 5 months 28 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between UCO Bank vs Mohammed Azeez A. et al regarding realization of money

Money Recovery Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 264 OF 2019

2019-11-15

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Abdu Rahman vs Ajeesh regarding U/s. 138 of N.I. Act

Criminal Case

ST No: 150/2017

TIRUR

2019-11-15

Unknown

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

42%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 4,243 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 126 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 98 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 83 cases)
Commission Plan (in 79 cases)
Tax receipt (in 70 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1779
Defendant Won: 1249

1249

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

15%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Produce Necessary Documents

Plaintiff consistently failed to present required documentation to support their claims in court.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Non-Payment of Batta Fees

Plaintiffs regularly did not pay required batta fees, leading to case dismissals for default.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Insufficient evidence was provided by the plaintiffs to substantiate their claims or means to pay debts.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

Frequent dismissal occurred due to the plaintiff's absence during court proceedings.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Produce Necessary Documents

Non-Payment of Batta Fees

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of the Plaintiff

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?