Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 1006 - 1010 of 3169

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Kunnamkulam Financing Company Ltd. vs Sideek regarding default in payment

Civil Suit

EP 131/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-09-27

1 year, 4 months, 3 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ali V.K. et al regarding satisfaction of decree

Execution Petition

EP 216/2015

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-09-27

2 years, 1 month, 28 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Manappuram Asset Finance Ltd. Trissur vs Koya Moideen et al regarding decree execution

Decree Execution - Civil Case

EP 407/2015

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-09-27

1 year, 10 months, 2 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kakkadavath Leela vs Sameer.K.M. et al regarding eviction and possession

Rent Control Petition - Eviction and Possession

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO.6 OF 2015

Tirur

2017-09-27

2 years 6 months 6 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kakkadavath Leela vs Sameer.K.M. et al regarding eviction for business purposes

Eviction - Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act

RCP 6/2015

Tirur

2017-09-27

2 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

50%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 3,169 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 15%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 73 cases)
Commission Report (in 69 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 60 cases)
Tax receipt (in 51 cases)
Agreement (in 43 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1600
Defendant Won: 1076

1076

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

20%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary fees, leading to dismissal for default.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Cases were dismissed when the petitioners did not attend court hearings as required.

Found in 19 cases (19%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs often did not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims or establish financial means.

Found in 18 cases (18%) High Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Many cases were dismissed because plaintiffs failed to properly issue notifications to relevant parties.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Petitioner

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?