Similar Cases
Based on: CS 17/2023 — Case between The State Bank of India vs Deepu Soman regarding settlement in mediation.
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
CS 3/2023
Case between EDISON JOHN vs K C VARGHESE et al regarding court fee remittance and case dismissal
The plaintiff, Edison John, is involved in a legal matter regarding the remittance of balance court fee, ultimately leading to a dismissal of the case due to failure to remit the fee. The defendant includes K C Varghese and Reena Varghese.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
CS 9/2023
Case between Lilly Thomas vs John Alexander et al regarding Restoration Petition.
Lilly Thomas, the petitioner, is seeking to restore a previously dismissed suit against John Alexander and others due to the absence of representation caused by health issues. The case involves a delay in filing a restoration petition.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
CS. 24/2025
Case between The Federal Bank vs Ameer N.K et al regarding security for an amount.
The Federal Bank is the petitioner seeking a conditional order of attachment against the respondents, who are accused of attempting to delay the execution of a decree. The court instructed the respondents to furnish security or show cause.
Commercial Case
Plaintiff Won
CS.14/2025
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank, Ulliyeri Branch vs Surjith. AS et al regarding furnishing security for an amount of 16,43,168/-
Kerala Gramin Bank filed a petition against Surjith AS and others to secure an amount of 16,43,168/-. The case addresses concerns that the respondents may dispose of property to delay execution of the decree.
Commercial Case
Plaintiff Won
C.S. No. 20/2025
Case between M/s. Medimall Kunnamangalam LLP vs Dr. Sujith A.K regarding petition filed under Order 9 Rule 13, r/w section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
This case involves Dr. Sujith A.K as the petitioner/defendant and M/s. Medimall Kunnamangalam LLP as the respondent/plaintiff. The petition was filed for dismissal of a previous order due to the absence of representation.
Commercial Case
Defendant Won
C.S. No. 411/2021
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sahadath et al regarding setting aside exparte decree
The case involves Kerala Gramin Bank as the plaintiff and Sahadath and others as defendants. The petition was filed to set aside an exparte decree against the defendants.
Commercial Case
Defendant Won
C.S. No. 398/2021
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sunny Varghese regarding EP. 153/2024
Kerala Gramin Bank filed a petition against Sunny Varghese in the Commercial Court. The matter was settled at mediation, and the agreement was found to be lawful.
Commercial Case
Plaintiff Won
EP.65/2025 in CS. 141/2020
Case between M/s. Expanded Polymer System Pvt. Ltd. vs Pattarkandi Arayanveettil Vinod et al regarding petition under Order XXI Rule 38 of the Code of Civil Procedure
M/s. Expanded Polymer System Pvt. Ltd. filed a petition against Pattarkandi Arayanveettil Vinod regarding non-compliance with court orders. The case involves a commercial dispute.
Commercial Case
Defendant Won
CS. 58/2023
Case between Bank of India vs Prasoon C regarding petition filed under Section 55 Order 21 Rule 37,38 of C.P.C.
The case involves Bank of India as the petitioner and Prasoon C as the respondent. The petition was filed by the Decree holder for specific orders under the Civil Procedure Code.
Commercial Case
Defendant Won
CS. No. 5/2023
Case between Poornendhu Enterprises vs Juby Stigi et al regarding dismissal of suit.
The plaintiff is Poornendhu Enterprises, represented by P.G Parameswaran Nair. The case concerns a suit that was ultimately dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and perceived lack of interest in proceeding.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
C.S.No. 15/2022
Case between IDBI Bank Ltd. vs Jomy K Jose and Reny Jose regarding restoration of ex parte judgment and decree.
The case involves a petition filed by Jomy K Jose, the first defendant, who seeks to set aside an ex parte judgment and decree due to his inability to appear in court. He claims sufficient cause for his absence was due to his mother's medical condition and caregiving responsibilities.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
CS No.3/2023
Case between Edison John vs K C Varghese et al regarding correction of clerical error
Edison John, the petitioner, seeks to correct an accidental clerical error in a prior court order. The respondents, K C Varghese and Reena Varghese, were absent and unrepresented in the previous proceedings.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OP(IP) No. 1/2025
Case between M/s Chempakasseril Finance et al vs M/s. Aiswarya Silks et al regarding legal representation of a deceased partner
The case involves M/s Chempakasseril Finance and its partners seeking to have the 2nd plaintiff recognized as the legal representative of the deceased 3rd plaintiff. The petition is contested by the defendants on various grounds regarding its maintainability.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OP(IP) No. 2/2025
Case between M/s Chempakasseril Finance et al vs M/s. Aiswarya Silks regarding legal representation of deceased partner
This case involves a petition by the surviving partner of a finance firm to be recognized as the legal representative of a deceased partner. The court considered objections raised by the defendants concerning the maintainability of the petition.
Injunction
Defendant Won
IA 3/2025
Case between Tessu Tojo vs Marykutty Joseph regarding IA 3/2025
Tessu Tojo and Marykutty Joseph are involved in a legal petition heard in the Commercial Court regarding an interim application. The court issued its final order on the matter.
Interim Application
MA (Arb) 1/2025
Case between Marykutty Joseph vs Tessu Tojo et al regarding urgent interim protection pending constitution of arbitral tribunal.
Marykutty Joseph seeks an injunction against Tessu Tojo and Tojo Thomas regarding the operations of a partnership firm. The petitioner claims the respondents are misappropriating funds and assets of the firm.
Arbitration
Plaintiff Won
C.S No. 5/2023
Case between Poornendhu Enterprises vs Juby Stiji et al regarding restoration of a dismissed suit
The petitioner, Poornendhu Enterprises, seeks to restore a suit dismissed for non-prosecution. The respondent, Juby Stiji, contests the restoration, citing negligence on the part of the petitioner.
Restoration Petition
Defendant Won
C.S No. 13/2024
Case between Canara Bank vs M/S Gurudev Enterprises regarding setting aside an ex-parte decree.
Canara Bank filed a suit against M/S Gurudev Enterprises, which was decreed ex-parte. The defendant sought to set aside this decree claiming personal difficulties prevented compliance.
Commercial Suit
Defendant Won
C.S No. 112/2023
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Nagarajan G et al regarding review of dismissal order
This case involves a petition by Bank of Baroda seeking to review and set aside an order that dismissed their restoration petition for default. The petitioner claims the dismissal was due to a clerical mistake that led to non-appearance of their counsel.
Review Petition
Plaintiff Won
C.S No. 1/2025
Case between The South Indian Bank Ltd. vs Smt.Mariamma Thomas et al regarding Banking dispute
The South Indian Bank Ltd. filed a suit against Smt.Mariamma Thomas and others regarding a banking matter. The issue was settled in mediation.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
C.S No. 129/2022
Case between M/s. Pazhayidom Food Ventures Pvt. Ltd. et al vs Mr. P.D Mohanan et al regarding admission of additional documents in a commercial suit.
The case involves M/s. Pazhayidom Food Ventures Pvt. Ltd. and its Managing Director Satheesh Mohan against the defendants including Mr. P.D Mohanan regarding the admission of certain documents into evidence. The court dismissed the application by the plaintiffs to admit additional documents after the trial had started.
Commercial Suit
Defendant Won
C.S No. 9/2025
Case between Jismon vs Babu Rajan et al regarding lifting of attachment order
This case involves a petition filed by Jismon against Babu Rajan and others regarding an attachment lifting order. The court allowed the petition after hearing the arguments.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
C.S No. 3/2025
Case between Kairali Impex Pvt. Ltd. vs P.J Chacko et al regarding balance court fee remittance
Kairali Impex Pvt. Ltd. is the plaintiff represented by Mr. Shihabudeen C.R. The case involves a suit where the balance court fee was not remitted despite repeated opportunities, leading to rejection of the plaint.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
C.S No. 5/2024
Case between State Bank Of India vs Sebastian Thomas et al regarding mediation settlement
The case involves State Bank Of India as the plaintiff and Sebastian Thomas and Bini Sebastian as defendants. The matter was settled in mediation and the court ordered the suit to be decreed as per the mediation agreement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
C.S No. 1/2024
Case between Mathevan Enterprices Private Ltd. vs Jose Agustin et al regarding suit decreed in terms of mediation agreement.
Mathevan Enterprices Private Ltd. filed a suit against Jose Agustin and others. The matter was settled in mediation, and the suit was decreed as per the mediation agreement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
C.S No. 99/2022
Case between M/s Dazzler Builders and Interiors vs Raveendran Nair et al regarding lifting attachment order
This case involves a petition by M/s Dazzler Builders and Interiors against Raveendran Nair and his wife, Syamala @ Omana Raveendran. The petition seeks to lift an attachment order related to a prior civil matter.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
C.S No. 3/2024
Case between Federal Bank Limited vs Sri. Sijo Kuriakose et al regarding mediation settlement
Federal Bank Limited filed a suit against Sri. Sijo Kuriakose and Nileena Xavier regarding a financial dispute. The matter was settled in mediation and the court decreed the suit in terms of the mediation agreement.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
C.S No. 45/2022
Case between The Manager, South Indian Bank Ltd. vs Smt. Saparna S Rajan et al regarding lifting attachment
The case involves The Manager of South Indian Bank Ltd. as the plaintiff and multiple defendants including Smt. Saparna S Rajan. It pertains to an application for lifting an attachment that was previously ordered.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
C.S No. 58/2022
Case between Novelty Clothing Pvt Ltd vs New Parthas Textiles Trading LLC regarding dismissal for default
Novelty Clothing Pvt Ltd (NCPL) filed a suit against New Parthas Textiles Trading LLC. The plaintiff was absent during the proceedings, leading to the dismissal of the case.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
C.S No. 14/2024
Case between South Indian Bank Ltd. vs Joisy Joseph et al regarding realization of money due under a car loan transaction.
The plaintiff, South Indian Bank Ltd., filed a suit against the defendants to recover dues from a car loan transaction. The defendants defaulted on repayments, leading to the bank classifying the loan as a Non-Performing Asset.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
M.A (Arb) No. 1/2024
Case between K.R Radhakrishnan vs M/s M.G Electricals et al regarding interim measures in arbitration.
K.R Radhakrishnan filed a petition seeking interim measures related to arbitration against M/s M.G Electricals and its proprietor. The court evaluated the validity of the arbitration agreement between the parties.
Arbitration Petition
Defendant Won
Restoration Petitiion 2854/2019
Case between P C Cherian et al vs T A Kurian et al regarding Restoration of Petition.
The case involves petitioners P C Cherian and Saramma Cheriyan seeking restoration of their petition against respondents T A Kurian and Grac. The petition was dismissed due to lack of medical evidence for the petitioner's claims.
Restoration Petition
Defendant Won
Restoration Petitiion 2856/2019
Case between P C Cherian et al vs T A Kurian et al regarding dismissal of restoration petition
The case involves a restoration petition filed by P C Cherian and others against T A Kurian and Gracy. The petition was dismissed due to the petitioner's failure to provide medical evidence for his illness.
Restoration Petition
Defendant Won
Restoration Petitiion 137/2024
Case between Elsamma Thomas vs Jomy Scaria et al regarding Restoration Petition
Elsamma Thomas filed a restoration petition against Jomy Scaria and others. The case was heard and decided on the same day.
Restoration Petition
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 183/2022
Case between Surendran. T.U vs State of Kerala et al regarding default dismissal of suit
Surendran. T.U is the plaintiff in this case against the State of Kerala and other defendants. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was not represented in court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
E.P. No.23/2020
Case between Balakrishan V vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding Execution Petition
Balakrishan V is the decree holder and Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd along with its director and his spouse are judgment debtors in this execution petition. The court considered the petition and closed it due to the decree holder's absence.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
E.P.24/2020 in OS No. 248/2018
Case between Rajeevan N vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding Execution Petition
Rajeevan N is the decree holder and Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt. Ltd. along with its directors are the judgment debtors. This execution petition was considered by the court and subsequently closed due to non-representation by the decree holder.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 25/2020
Case between Reshmitha M vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding Execution Petition
Reshmitha M is the petitioner seeking execution of a decree against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The court found the decree holder absent and closed the execution petition.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 48/2021
Case between Chandrasekharan P vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding execution petition.
Chandrasekharan P is the petitioner seeking execution against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The execution petition was heard and closed due to the decree holder not being represented.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 49/2021
Case between Chandrasekharan P vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding Execution Petition
Chandrasekharan P is the petitioner and decree holder in an execution petition against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and others. The court ordered the closure of the execution petition due to the decree holder not being represented and defects not being cured.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 50/2021
Case between Renuka P vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding execution petition
Renuka P is the decree holder in this execution petition against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The petition was closed as the decree holder was not represented and the defect was not cured.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 53/2021
Case between Ramesh Kumar vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding execution petition.
Ramesh Kumar is the petitioner seeking execution of a decree against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The petition was heard and the court closed the execution petition due to the decree holder not being represented.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 54/2021
Case between O P Vijayan vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding Execution Petition
The case involves O P Vijayan as the petitioner who is seeking execution of a decree against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The court closed the execution petition due to the absence of representation from the decree holder.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 55/2021
Case between Hilda Fernandez @ Hilda Lawrence vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding execution petition
Hilda Fernandez is the petitioner seeking execution of the decree against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its director K.N. Rajeev. The execution petition was closed due to the decree holder not being represented and the defect not being cured.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 56/2021
Case between Kalyani C vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding execution petition
Kalyani C is the petitioner seeking enforcement of a decree against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and other respondents. The court ruled that the decree holder was not represented and closed the execution petition due to lack of action.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 57/2021
Case between Pushpa P vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding execution petition
This case involves an execution petition filed by Pushpa P against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The decree holder was not represented in court during the hearing.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
EP No. 65/2021
Case between Vijayalakshmi P K vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd et al regarding Execution Petition
Vijayalakshmi P K is the decree holder and has filed an execution petition against Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt Ltd and its directors. The court closed the execution petition as the decree holder was not represented and no steps were taken.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
E.P.66/2021
Case between Meenakshi Amma vs Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding execution petition
The case involves Meenakshi Amma as the petitioner and Sigs Tech Marketing Pvt. Ltd. along with other defendants. The petition was for the execution of a decree.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won