Case Summary
M/s. Expanded Polymer System Pvt. Ltd. filed a petition against Pattarkandi Arayanveettil Vinod regarding non-compliance with court orders. The case involves a commercial dispute.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Commercial Case
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the execution petition for default as the required steps were not taken by the petitioner.
Key Reasoning:
Steps not taken by the petitioner.
Steps not taken by the petitioner.
Why Defendant Won:
Steps not taken by the petitioner.
Steps not taken by the petitioner.
Supporting Evidence
Steps not taken by the petitioner.
Judgment Evidence:
Steps not taken. Hence, EP dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s. Expanded Polymer System Pvt. Ltd.
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Pattarkandi Arayanveettil Vinod
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Petitioner
- Advocate Name
- Smt. K.P Regha
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Prasod U.K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
EP dismissed for default
Evidence:
Steps not taken. Hence, EP dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Commercial Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. Expanded Polymer System Pvt. Ltd. vs Pattarkandi Arayanveettil Vinod et al regarding petition under Order XXI Rule 38 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Expanded Polymer System Pvt. Ltd. vs Pattarkandi Arayanveettil Vinod et al regarding petition under Order XXI Rule 38 of the Code of Civil Procedure