Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
CS 3/2023

Case between EDISON JOHN vs K C VARGHESE et al regarding court fee remittance and case dismissal

Court
Commercial Court, Pala
Judge
Smt.Rajasree Rajgopal
Order Date
2025-01-13
Duration
Case Code No.
3
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Edison John, is involved in a legal matter regarding the remittance of balance court fee, ultimately leading to a dismissal of the case due to failure to remit the fee. The defendant includes K C Varghese and Reena Varghese.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff failed to remit the balance court fee despite being given sufficient time.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff failed to remit the balance court fee despite being given sufficient time.
Key Reasoning:
The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's failure to comply with remitting the court fee.
Why Defendant Won:
The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's failure to comply with remitting the court fee.
Supporting Evidence
The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's failure to comply with remitting the court fee.

Judgment Evidence:

Since Balance Court Fee not remitted even after giving sufficient time. Plaint rejected U/s Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
EDISON JOHN
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K C VARGHESE
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Reena Varghese
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Balance court fee documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jacob P T
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Surendran P
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaint rejected U/s Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC due to non-remittance of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Since Balance Court Fee not remitted even after giving sufficient time.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court, Pala
Common Reasons
Case Code
CS
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Pala
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court, Pala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Lilly Thomas vs John Alexander et al regarding Restoration Petition.
Commercial Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between IDBI Bank Ltd. vs Jomy K Jose and Reny Jose regarding restoration of ex parte judgment and decree.
COMMERCIAL COURT , SUB JUDGE, PALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Edison John vs K C Varghese et al regarding correction of clerical error
Court of the Sub Judge, Pala
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Chempakasseril Finance et al vs M/s. Aiswarya Silks et al regarding legal representation of a deceased partner
COMMERCIAL COURT
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Poornendhu Enterprises vs Juby Stigi et al regarding dismissal of suit.
COMMERCIAL COURT, PALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won