| Niyamam AI

Displaying 241 - 245 of 21883

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Leelamary vs Yohannan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No.654/2022

Kollam

2025-10-27

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Anil Kumar. B vs K.S. Baiju regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 708/2019

Kollam

2025-10-27

approximately-6 years 5 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Riyaz Ahamad vs Subha Ravikumar regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

OS. No.715/2015

Kollam

2025-10-27

approximately-10 years 5 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kousalya et al vs Lekshmikutty et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 316/2018

Kollam

2025-10-28

approximately-7 years 7 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between G Gopakumar et al vs Nil regarding issuance of Succession Certificate

OP(Succession)

OP(SUCCESSION).02/2025

Kollam

2025-10-28

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9639

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Multiple plaintiffs failed to pay the required batta, resulting in case dismissals for default.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs frequently failed to provide sufficient evidence supporting their claims, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioner in Court

Many cases were dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence, hindering the proceedings from advancing.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notice

Plaintiffs often failed to take necessary steps to issue notices, resulting in case dismissals for default.

Found in 12 cases (12%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of Petitioner in Court

Failure to Issue Notice

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?