| Niyamam AI

Displaying 251 - 255 of 21883

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Ansad vs Jameela Beevi regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 704/2018

Kollam

2025-10-29

approximately-7 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Raju. M vs B.Prabhakaran Pillai regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

OS. No.781/2018

Kollam

2025-10-30

approximately-9 years 11 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sha Salim vs Yahiya regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 53/2024

Kollam

2025-10-30

approximately-2 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between B. Chandran vs Shylaja regarding Suit for realisation of money

Civil Suit

OS. No.186/2021

Kollam

2025-10-30

approximately-4 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Asokan V vs Union of India regarding declaration as to the date of birth

Civil Suit

OS. No. 572/2023

Kollam

2025-10-17

approximately-2 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9639

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

24%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required court fees or batta, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many plaintiffs could not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims or prove financial means.

Found in 23 cases (23%) High Impact

Absence of Petitioners

Judgments were dismissed due to petitioners not appearing for court hearings.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Plaintiffs often failed to take necessary steps to issue notices to defendants, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of Petitioners

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?