Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.654/2022

Case between Leelamary vs Yohannan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-10-27
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Leelamary, filed a suit against the defendant, Yohannan, for a permanent prohibitory injunction regarding money borrowed. The case involved allegations of harassment and threats made by the defendant towards the plaintiff and her family.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit is dismissed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is dismissed.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to prove her right over the plaint schedule property and did not establish a potential threat from the defendant.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The apprehension of plaintiff is not proved. Here, the plaintiff not established that there is a potential threat against her.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Leelamary
Party Age
56
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Yohannan
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Tax Receipt dated 22.08.2022
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv.Gopakumar G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv.Prahladan. S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff sought a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant.
Evidence:
The apprehension of plaintiff is not proved. Here, the plaintiff not established that there is a potential threat against her.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax receipt supporting the plaintiff's ownership of property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax receipt supporting the plaintiff's ownership of property.
Reference:
Ext.A2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Leelamary vs Yohannan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Leelamary vs Yohannan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Financial liability - dishonoured cheque

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won