| Niyamam AI

Displaying 3356 - 3360 of 15105

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Gopakumar vs Chandrababu regarding injunction

Injunction

OS. No. 705/2021

Kollam

2025-07-15

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Deepa vs Sajeevan Pillai et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 526/2019

Kollam

2025-07-16

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Abdul Hakeem M et al vs Shamsudeen et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 534/2023

Kollam

2025-07-16

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Preethi vs Sree Vinayaka Chitts et al regarding Realisation of Money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 1031/2023

Kollam

2025-07-16

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between State Bank of India et al vs Umalghana Rani.S et al regarding petition filed under Order XXI Rule 10 and 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Civil Suit

EP.No. 200/2024

Kollam

2025-07-16

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

39%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,022 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 4.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 574 cases)
Sale deed (in 480 cases)
Tax receipt (in 375 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 183 cases)
Death Certificate (in 182 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 5903
Defendant Won: 8099

8137

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

36%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Absence of the Plaintiff

The plaintiff was frequently absent during hearings, resulting in dismissal of the case for lack of representation.

Found in 36 cases (36%) High Impact

Failure to Produce Evidence

Plaintiffs often failed to present necessary evidence to support their claims, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Default Due to Non-Payment

Cases were dismissed due to the plaintiffs' failure to pay necessary costs or fees required by the court.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Inactivity in Proceedings

Plaintiffs failed to take appropriate actions to progress their cases, leading to dismissals for inactivity.

Found in 12 cases (12%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Absence of the Plaintiff

Failure to Produce Evidence

Default Due to Non-Payment

Inactivity in Proceedings

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?