Case Summary
The plaintiff, Deepa, filed a suit for injunction against the defendants Sajeevan Pillai, Paravur SNVRC Bank Ltd., and Reena Sajeev. The case was heard in court on July 16, 2025.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaintiff's suit.
Key Reasoning:
The case was dismissed due to both parties being absent and no applications filed.
The case was dismissed due to both parties being absent and no applications filed.
Why Defendant Won:
The case was dismissed due to both parties being absent and no applications filed.
The case was dismissed due to both parties being absent and no applications filed.
Supporting Evidence
Both sides absent, represented. BCF not remitted. No application filed. Plaint rejected.
Judgment Evidence:
Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 16th day of July, 2025.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Deepa
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sajeevan Pillai
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Paravur SNVRC Bank Ltd.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Reena Sajeev
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Somasekharan Pillai. K & S.R.Prasanth
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- R.Letha, Parvathy Mohandas - D1 & D3 A. Arun Lal - D2
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The suit filed by the plaintiff for injunction was rejected.
Evidence:
Both sides absent, represented. BCF not remitted. No application filed. Plaint rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Deepa vs Sajeevan Pillai et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Deepa vs Sajeevan Pillai et al regarding injunction