Case Summary
This suit is filed by the plaintiffs for a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiffs were absent during the hearings, resulting in the suit being dismissed for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiffs were absent during the hearing, leading to the suit being dismissed for default.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Abdul Hakeem M
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Riyas N
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shamsudeen
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kamarudeen
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sharafudeen
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abdul Hakeem
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Hamsa
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- R.Renjith.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sooraj R.Mynagappally.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- B.N. Haskar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Permanent prohibitory injunction sought by the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Abdul Hakeem M et al vs Shamsudeen et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Abdul Hakeem M et al vs Shamsudeen et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction