Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.1075/2023

Case between Leslie Pallath vs Sajeesh K M regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi. K. Dinamany
Order Date
2025-01-16
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Leslie Pallath filed a suit against Sajeesh K M for recovery of arrears of rent and maintenance charges for a residential apartment. The defendant had defaulted on rent payments and was evicted for non-payment.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that Sajeesh K M must pay Leslie Pallath a sum of Rs. 4,55,686 with interest for the arrears of rent and charges. The plaintiff is also entitled to costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Payment of Rs. 4,55,686 with interest and costs of the suit.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that Sajeesh K M must pay Leslie Pallath a sum of Rs. 4,55,686 with interest for the arrears of rent and charges. The plaintiff is also entitled to costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established a case for recovery of the owed amount.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established a case for recovery of the owed amount.
Supporting Evidence
On perusal of the plaint, proof affidavit and documents produced, I am of the view that plaintiff has established a case.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: 1) Defendant shall pay Rs.4,55,686/- (Rupees Four lakhs fifty five thousand six hundred and eighty six only) with interest @ 6% per annum on the principal amount of Rs.4,09,500/- (Rupees Four lakhs nine thousand five hundred only) from the date of suit till the date of decree or realization, as the case may be, to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Leslie Pallath
Party Age
71
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sajeesh K M
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of lawyer notice issued to the defendant on behalf of the plaintiff, Certified copy of reply letter issued by the defendant, Certified copy of RCP 39/23 filed by the plaintiff before the Rent Control Court, Ernakulam, Certified copy of Memo filed by the respondent counsel in RCP 39/23
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Basil Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ninan John
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ajay Krishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sanjana Sara Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Arya A R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anjitha Jobi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rosemaria
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Shahul Hameed Moopan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
T A Niyas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Abhijith Harindran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Arun T S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought to recover an amount of Rs. 4,55,686/- along with interest from the defendant.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows: Defendant shall pay Rs.4,55,686/- (Rupees Four lakhs fifty five thousand six hundred and eighty six only) with interest @ 6% per annum on the principal amount of Rs.4,09,500/- (Rupees Four lakhs nine thousand five hundred only) from the date of suit till the date of decree or realization.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This is the notice sent to the defendant demanding payment of arrears of rent.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This is the response from the defendant acknowledging the liability and seeking time to pay.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Rent Control Petition
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This is the petition filed by the plaintiff before the Rent Control Court against the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This memo was filed accompanying the surrender of premises and handing over the key.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Leslie Pallath vs Sajeesh K M regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Leslie Pallath vs Sajeesh K M regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Krishnakala Panicker vs Dibu K John regarding recovery of dues from tenant.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between K.V. Thomas et al vs M/s ALTAIM et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dr. Radha Devi vs Sri. Sunil Kumar C.S regarding realisation of money
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between K H Ramlath Nazer vs Apex India Education and Charitable Trust et al regarding realization of money
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Roby K. Skariah vs Merin Paul regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won