Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 569/2024

Case between Krishnakala Panicker vs Dibu K John regarding recovery of dues from tenant.

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-10-10
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Krishnakala Panicker, sued the defendant, Dibu K John, for recovery of dues owed for rent and damages after the defendant, a former tenant, failed to pay amounts owed. The court found in favor of the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered the defendant to pay a total of Rs.2,21,840/- to the plaintiff along with interest. The defendant is also liable for the costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant shall pay Rs.2,21,840/- along with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the defendant to pay a total of Rs.2,21,840/- to the plaintiff along with interest. The defendant is also liable for the costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established a case by demonstrating the defendant's failure to pay rent and arrears.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established a case by demonstrating the defendant's failure to pay rent and arrears.
Supporting Evidence
On perusal of the plaint, proof affidavit and documents produced, I am of the view that plaintiff has established a case and plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.2,21,840/- with interest from defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: Defendant shall pay Rs.2,21,840/-(Rupees Two lakhs twenty one thousand eight hundred and forty only) along with interest @12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and @6% from the date of decree till the date of payment or realization, as the case may be, to plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Krishnakala Panicker
Party Age
45
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Raghul D Panicker
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dibu K John
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Power of Attorney dated 22.09.2023, Lease agreement dated 21.03.2022, Agreement dated 01.02.2023, Letter dated 31.03.2023.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Satheesh V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Krishnapriya P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
N Sreeprakash
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.2,21,840/- with interest.
Evidence:
Plaintiff has established a case and plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.2,21,840/- with interest from defendant.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the plaintiff in favour of Raghul D Panicker.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lease Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document detailing the lease agreement between the plaintiff and defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
An agreement executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Letter issued by the defendant to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Krishnakala Panicker vs Dibu K John regarding recovery of dues from tenant.
Case Code Year
Case between Krishnakala Panicker vs Dibu K John regarding recovery of dues from tenant.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M/s QUBEFIX vs Rasheeda Marikar et al regarding eviction and rent arrears
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between K.V. Thomas et al vs M/s ALTAIM et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dr. Radha Devi vs Sri. Sunil Kumar C.S regarding realisation of money
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between K H Ramlath Nazer vs Apex India Education and Charitable Trust et al regarding realization of money
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Roby K. Skariah vs Merin Paul regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won