Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 603/2024

Case between K.V. Thomas et al vs M/s ALTAIM et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-11-28
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, K.V. Thomas and others, are the owners of a building leased to the 1st defendant, M/s ALTAIM. They filed a suit due to non-payment of rent and violations of the lease agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs by ordering the defendants to refrain from trespassing and taking possession of the leased property. Costs of the suit were also awarded to the plaintiffs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants 1 and 2 are restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule building and from transferring or taking possession of the plaint schedule building, during the pendency of the leased deed.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs by ordering the defendants to refrain from trespassing and taking possession of the leased property. Costs of the suit were also awarded to the plaintiffs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs provided sufficient evidence of the defendants' failure to pay rent and contractual violations.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiffs provided sufficient evidence of the defendants' failure to pay rent and contractual violations.
Supporting Evidence
The affidavit and documents would satisfactorily prove the plaintiff's case.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed in part as follows: 1. Defendants 1 and 2, their men and agents or anybody acting under them are restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule building and from transferring or taking possession of the plaint schedule building, during the pendency of the leased deed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.V. Thomas
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Myrtle Thomas
Party Age
56
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vivek Thomas
Party Age
33
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s ALTAIM
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anas P.A
Relation
Managing Partner
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Municipal Corporation of Kochi
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
True copy of the lawyer notice issued to the defendant
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Shiju Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Manu T.M
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sachu Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anaina Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.K.Sajeevan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.A.Abdul Nistar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
B.Radhakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Athira Sajeevan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Niyatha Rageev
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Francis K.V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Pravitha T
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Defendants 1 and 2 are restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule building during the pendency of the leased deed.
Evidence:
Defendants 1 and 2, their men and agents or anybody acting under them are restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule building and from transferring or taking possession of the plaint schedule building, during the pendency of the leased deed.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Plaintiff shall also be entitled for the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court referenced the lawyer notice issued to the defendant as evidence of the demand for rent arrears.
Reference:
Ext.A1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between K.V. Thomas et al vs M/s ALTAIM et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between K.V. Thomas et al vs M/s ALTAIM et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between K M Babu vs Vyapar Mandir Palarivattom Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding temporary injunction
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s QUBEFIX vs Rasheeda Marikar et al regarding eviction and rent arrears
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dr. Satish Bhat vs K S Vinod regarding eviction and recovery of arrears of rent
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M. D Antony vs M/s. Indus Towers Ltd. regarding recovery of possession and arrears of rent
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between K H Ramlath Nazer vs Apex India Education and Charitable Trust et al regarding realization of money
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won