Case Summary
Latha Murali filed a suit against Subaida P and others regarding non-payment of rent and compliance with court orders. The plaintiff failed to comply with the court's directive to pay rent arrears, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the plaintiff failed to comply with the condition to pay rent arrears, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Latha Murali
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Subaida P
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Febin Hashim
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Fymin Puliyenchalil
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Fasmin Puliyenchalil
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.M.Girijavallabhan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K.Shaj
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Beena N Kartha
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Arun Chand
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Kevin James
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Bharat Vijay P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Gopika Gopal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Minu Vittoria Paulson
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Archana P.P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- A.R.Jumana Zulphikar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to non-compliance with the court's order regarding rent arrears.
Evidence:
the plaintiff having failed to comply with the common order in IA 2/2024 and 5/2024 and having failed to show sufficient cause for not depositing the rent arrears in liable to suffer consequence as held by the Hon’ble High Court in the above decision. Therefore, the suit is only liable to be dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Latha Murali vs Subaida P et al regarding rent arrears and compliance of court orders.
Case Code Year
Case between Latha Murali vs Subaida P et al regarding rent arrears and compliance of court orders.