Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 719/2020

Case between Alex Joseph vs Shenoi Rajan et al regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction and other reliefs

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-11-22
Duration
approximately-4 years 7 months
Case Closed
Fri, 11/22/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Alex Joseph is the plaintiff claiming ownership and possession of a property against defendants Shenoi Rajan and Gibin Babu. The case revolves around the defendants' failure to pay rent and their attempt to unlawfully enter the premises.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed a permanent prohibitory injunction, restraining the defendants from entering the plaintiff's property and interfering with his possession. The plaintiff is entitled to recover costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction restraining defendants from entering the property and interfering with the plaintiff's possession.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed a permanent prohibitory injunction, restraining the defendants from entering the plaintiff's property and interfering with his possession. The plaintiff is entitled to recover costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the plaintiff's claims substantiated by unrebutted testimony and evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found the plaintiff's claims substantiated by unrebutted testimony and evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 and Exts. A1 to A8 established her case as pleaded by her. In the absence of any countervailing evidence to contradict these proof of plaint claim and Exhibits, I learn that same remains uncontroverted and accordingly admitted.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows. A decree of permanent prohibitory injunction is passed restraining the defendants, his men and agents from entering into the plaint schedule building and interfering with the plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule building.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Alex Joseph
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shenoi Rajan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Gibin Babu
Plaintiffs Documents
Original power of attorney, Original partition deed, Original building tax receipt, Original land tax receipt, Original agreement between plaintiff and defendant, Copy of lawyer's notice, Original reply notice, Original agreement between the plaintiff and the new licensee.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.B. Sandeep
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sreeja K.P.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
A decree restraining the defendants from entering the plaintiff's property.
Evidence:
A decree of permanent prohibitory injunction is passed restraining the defendants, his men and agents from entering into the plaint schedule building and interfering with the plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule building.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to recover costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from the defendants and from their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Established the authority of the plaintiff to file the suit.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrated the plaintiff's ownership of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Building Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provided evidence of the plaintiff's financial obligations related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supported the claim of ownership by showing tax compliance.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Lease Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Outlined the terms under which the defendants occupied the property.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicated the plaintiff's legal efforts to resolve the dispute.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Showed the defendants' acknowledgment of the issues raised.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Agreement with New Licensee
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrated the plaintiff's actions taken in response to the defendants' breach.
Reference:
Ext.A8

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Alex Joseph vs Shenoi Rajan et al regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction and other reliefs
Case Code Year
Case between Alex Joseph vs Shenoi Rajan et al regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction and other reliefs

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 10/01/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 11/22/2024 - 12:00
From
Fri, 11/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 11/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Krishnakala Panicker vs Dibu K John regarding recovery of dues from tenant.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between K.V. Thomas et al vs M/s ALTAIM et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dr. Radha Devi vs Sri. Sunil Kumar C.S regarding realisation of money
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between K H Ramlath Nazer vs Apex India Education and Charitable Trust et al regarding realization of money
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Roby K. Skariah vs Merin Paul regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won