| Niyamam AI

Displaying 3061 - 3065 of 22030

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Jayaprakash.B et al vs M.V. Vinod Kumar et al regarding I.A.01/2025

Civil Suit

OS.No.1745/2025

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-10-24

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Nithya.L.S vs Anusha.V et al regarding boundary dispute

Civil Suit

OS.No.749/2023

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-10-25

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Bernadine Narcisus Silva @ B.N. Silva vs Rajendra Rao regarding Sale Deed dispute

Civil Suit

OS.1397/2025

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-10-25

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Leela et al vs Peerumohammed regarding appointment of advocate commissioner

Civil Suit

O.S. No.1050/2024

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-10-27

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Dr Palpu Foundation et al vs Ambalathara Chandra Babu et al regarding declaration of office bearers

Civil Suit

OS. No.1743/2024

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-10-28

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9707

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

20%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Provide Evidence

Plaintiffs did not present sufficient evidence to demonstrate the respondents' means to pay debts or support claims.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Default Due to Non-Payment

Petitions were dismissed for default primarily due to plaintiffs not paying necessary fees or batta.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Lack of Representation

Petitioners frequently failed to appear in court, leading to dismissals for non-representation.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Plaintiffs often failed to take necessary steps such as issuing notices or filing documents on time.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Provide Evidence

Default Due to Non-Payment

Lack of Representation

Failure to Take Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?