Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.749/2023

Case between Nithya.L.S vs Anusha.V et al regarding boundary dispute

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Judge
Smt. Salini.B.
Order Date
2025-10-25
Duration
Case Code No.
749
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Nithya.L.S has filed a petition regarding a boundary dispute. The case involves multiple defendants who are counter petitioners in the matter.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The court has kept the disposed commission application in abeyance until the final decision of the boundary fixation dispute is resolved.
Judgment Favored
Unknown
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court has kept the disposed commission application in abeyance until the final decision of the boundary fixation dispute is resolved.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

The disposed commission application is kept in abeyance. For producing final decision of the above. Posted to 11/11/2025.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Nithya.L.S
Party Age
21
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anusha.V
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Biju.J
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dr.Aruna.V
Party Age
33
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sajil..A.C
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Joy
Party Age
41
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.R.Vidyadharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
The court has kept the disposed commission application in abeyance until the final proceedings in the said dispute are resolved.
Evidence:
Hence until the final proceedings in the said dispute before Survey Directorate and before Revenue Minister, the disposed commission application is kept in abeyance.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Survey Document
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This document revealed the dispute regarding the fixation of boundary in Survey No.329/8 and 10.
Reference:
Document No.2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won