Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1745/2025

Case between Jayaprakash.B et al vs M.V. Vinod Kumar et al regarding I.A.01/2025

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-10-24
Duration
Case Code No.
1745
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a petition filed by the plaintiffs Jayaprakash.B, Jayaprasad.B, and Jayasree.N against the defendants M.V. Vinod Kumar, M.V. Vinoj Kumar, and M.V. Viraj Kumar. The court allowed the petition and appointed an advocate commissioner to ascertain relevant matters regarding the plaint schedule property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition and appointed an advocate commissioner to investigate the matter further.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition and appointed an advocate commissioner to investigate the matter further.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners made out a prima facie case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioners made out a prima facie case.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioners has made out a prima facie case.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, for ascertaining the matters in the petition and for elucidating the disputes between the parties, this IA is allowed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jayaprakash.B
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jayaprasad.B
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jayasree.N
Party Age
60
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M.V. Vinod Kumar
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M.V. Vinoj Kumar
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M.V. Viraj Kumar
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.G. Ajith Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. B. Vasudevan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Court
Advocate Name
Adv. Deepa Gopinath
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The IA is allowed for ascertaining the matters in the petition and elucidating the disputes.
Evidence:
Hence, for ascertaining the matters in the petition and for elucidating the disputes between the parties, this IA is allowed.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Appointment of an advocate commissioner to visit the property.
Evidence:
Adv. Deepa Gopinath is appointed as the advocate commissioner.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Affidavit
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Perused the affidavit, plaint and other documents.
Reference:
Document Type: Plaint
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Perused the affidavit, plaint and other documents.
Reference:
Document Type: Commissioner's Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Adv. Deepa Gopinath is appointed as the advocate commissioner to ascertain and report the relevant matters.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won