Private Individual

Multiple decree holders filed a case against judgment debtors seeking property delivery, which was granted by the court and petition closed.

Kamalakshi Amma filed a petition against Rajasekharan, Pankajam, and Parvathy. The respondents chose to remain exparte, resulting in the court's decision based on the merits of the petition presented by the petitioner.

This restoration petition involves multiple petitioners against respondents over a dispute requiring a deposit of a cost for procedural action. The petition was dismissed due to non-compliance with the deposit condition.

Petitioners filed a restoration petition against respondents, seeking relief.

Decree holder filed a case against multiple judgment debtors regarding property delivery, where the property was delivered as per court order.

The case involves Thennala Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. as the decree holder against Sukumaran and Shaji, addressing the execution of a previous court decree regarding financial matters.

Vineesh Kumar and multiple other petitioners filed a case against Subrahmanian and others for failing to file an affidavit and produce a certificate as directed by the High Court.

The case involves Vineeshkumar et al seeking compliance with High Court directions from Kumaran, which was closed due to failure to submit affidavit and documents as directed by the High Court.

Petitioner Kalamannayil Kunhalavi filed a petition against respondents Chenath Shukkoor and Jameela seeking compliance with directives issued in CMA.28/13.

Petitioner Cheriya Kallyapurath Muhammed Hashim filed a petition against respondent Naduvilaparambil Ali Haji, which was allowed conditionally upon depositing a cost of Rs.10,000 by a specified date.