Private Individual

Plaintiffs sought declaration and injunction but suit was dismissed due to plaintiff's absence.

Plaintiffs, children of Tharammal Puthenpeediyekkal Kunhimuhammed, sought partition of property, claiming ownership through ancestral and assigned shares. Defendants contested on grounds of prior ownership and equitable considerations.

The plaintiff filed a suit against the defendant for eviction and realization of arrears of rent, claiming bonafide need of the property for his daughter after marriage. The defendant disputed the tenancy and alleged fraudulent transactions regarding the property.

Plaintiff filed suit seeking mandatory injunction to remove a wall obstructing their right of way as per partition deed, which was being used for access to their property.

Plaintiff Palakkal Hamza, residing in Tirur Taluk, filed a suit for injunction against defendants residing in Iringavoor,amsom,desom Tiru Taluk. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and had no representation.

Palakkal Hamza, the plaintiff, filed a suit for injunction against Kunnath Saidalavi et al. However, the suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and not represented.

Two separate petitions filed by petitioners seeking eviction of respondents from the petition schedule building due to bonafide need and damages caused by respondents.

The petitioners filed a petition seeking eviction of the respondent from a building due to arrears in rent and for their bonafide need to conduct a hardware and paints business.

Decree holder Padikkal Shahoof sought payment from judgment debtors Parambil Ibrahim and Parambil Sameer. The judgment debtor was arrested, paid Rs.5000, and full satisfaction was recorded resulting in the closure of the Execution Petition.

Petitioner Pramod.P.T. filed a petition seeking restoration of a suit that was dismissed due to inability to appear in court. Respondent K. Balan opposed the petition stating it was a delay tactic.