Private Individual

Kunheen Haji, residing in Tirur Taluk, filed a suit for injunction against Chekidapurath Muhammed Kutty's children and others from Punnathala amsom, Tirur Taluk. The plaintiff later decided not to press the suit, leading to its dismissal.

Plaintiff filed a suit seeking injunction and right of way. A compromise was reached where the defendant agreed to provide a 3 feet way for the plaintiff's use.

Plaintiff, Gopalan, and defendants, Sajeevan, Sreedharan, and Leela, residing in Tirur Taluk, compromised the suit regarding an injunction. Defendants agreed not to obstruct plaintiff's possession as per the lawful terms of compromise.

Plaintiff K.P.Biju filed a suit against defendant T.K.Dinesh Kumar for money. The suit was dismissed based on a compromise between the parties.

The plaintiff filed an application for restoration of the suit under Order 9 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which was allowed with costs of Rs.1000 to Legal Service Authority.

The plaintiff sought a mandatory injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants to regain possession of a house in the plaint schedule property.

Fathima, a 55-year-old plaintiff, filed a suit against the children of Thalappil Moideenkutty seeking declaration and partition of properties.

The plaintiffs sought the court's intervention to fix the boundary between properties and obtain a mandatory injunction to remove encroachments.

Plaintiff Kunhimuhammed, aged 66, filed a suit for injunction against the defendant Abdulla, aged 60, which was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff.

The case concerns a petition filed under the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965. The matter was settled via a compromise where the respondent agreed to an enhanced monthly rent of Rs.10,500/- and timely payments.