Private Individual

Subaida filed a case against Aayisha Beevi and others seeking delivery of property, which was granted by the court and the execution petition was closed.

The petitioner, representing legal heirs, seeks eviction of respondents from a property to start a ladies garments shop, claiming bonafide need as the main reason.

The petitioner sought the division of property as per a preliminary decree for partition dated 18-07-2013.

Decree holder Kunhumoidu Haji along with others filed a petition against defendants for default judgment. The petition was dismissed for default as the petitioner was absent and no representation was made.

The suit involves a partition dispute concerning the inheritance of a property after presuming the civil death of one of the co-owners, Mr. Muhammed. The plaintiffs, who are the legal heirs of Mr. Muhammed, seek a declaration of civil death and partition of his share in the property.

Plaintiff filed a suit against the defendant to realize an amount of Rs. 9,50,000 borrowed for business expansion, which the defendant failed to repay after issuing dishonored cheques.

Thurakkal Unneenkutty filed a suit against Pathutty and Puthuvalli Muhammed seeking to fix the boundary between their properties as there was a dispute regarding the boundary after the defendants obstructed the plaintiff's construction of a wall on the determined boundary.

Mamben Nidhi Ltd Branch Office filed a suit seeking injunction against Moideenkutty and Muhammed, which was dismissed as not pressed.

Petitioner filed an execution petition seeking delivery of specific plots as per final decree, but the petition was dismissed due to lack of consent from a co-respondent.

Ayishu, the petitioner, filed an application under Rule 13 of the Civil Procedure Code which was dismissed as parties were absent.