Private Individual

The plaintiff, Manoharan, and the defendant, Ramadas, are brothers involved in a dispute over the ownership and possession of a property in Kadamakkudy Village. The plaintiff seeks a mandatory injunction to vacate the property, claiming that the defendant, who was allowed to reside in a shed on the property, has overstayed and caused disturbances.

Bank of Baroda filed a suit against Ratheesh P.S for recovery of an outstanding loan amount. The defendant defaulted on the repayment, leading to the bank declaring the loan as a Non-Performing Asset.

Louis Anthony, the plaintiff, is seeking a legal remedy for the fixation of boundary and an injunction against the defendant, Nebu @ Chackochan, who is allegedly trying to trespass into the plaintiff's property. The case has raised issues related to property valuation and the right of the plaintiff over the concerned property.

The Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. filed a suit against S Francis which has now been settled. The bank's counsel stated that they are not interested in proceeding with the suit.

Kochuthressia Thomas is seeking recovery of possession and an injunction against Gopalan and Kalidasan due to an obstruction on a pathway. The plaintiff alleges that the defendants have blocked access to her property, which she purchased and has a right to use as per the sale deed.

The plaintiff, Shanoj R, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Joseph Augustin and Lenin Joseph, to prevent them from destroying a sacred serpent grove. The defendants had been allegedly trespassing and causing damage to the grove, which has been in existence for over 1000 years.

The case involves M/s Indo Quartz as the plaintiff and M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. and others as defendants. The plaintiff filed a petition under Order 38 Rule 5, claiming that the defendants intended to withdraw funds to defeat a potential decree against them.

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. is the decree holder, while the judgment debtors include the Manager of DTDC Express Limited and the company itself. The case involves the satisfaction of a decree.

The case involves a petition filed by various defendants seeking rejection of the plaint for lack of jurisdiction. The plaintiffs are cable operators contesting the legality of a circular affecting their operational agreements.

The case involves M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. as the plaintiff and Kalamassery Municipality as the defendant. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.