Private Individual

Jigsy Joy filed a suit against Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited and its Location Manager regarding a court fee refund. The case was settled through mediation.

Jigsy Joy filed a suit against Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited and its Location Manager regarding the refund of court fees. Both parties reached a settlement through mediation, and the court decreed the suit as per the terms of the mediation agreement.

The Kerala State Civil Supplies Corporation has filed a suit against T.A. Abdulla for the realization of money due to irregularities found in the sale of subsidized items during his tenure as an outlet in-charge. The allegations include the sale of subsidized commodities in excess of the allowed limits leading to a financial loss for the corporation.

The petitioners are seeking a Succession Certificate for the property of the late M.A. Uthaman, claiming to be his legal heirs. The respondents dispute this claim, asserting that the first petitioner is not the legally wedded wife of the late Uthaman.

Sooraj Naik has filed a suit against Bajaj Finserv Limited and its associated parties. The mediation resulted in a settlement, leading to the decree of the suit as per the terms of the mediation agreement.

T.K.Shoukath Ali and others filed a suit against The Puthupallipuram SNDP Branch no. 219 and others seeking relief from forceful eviction from their rented business premises. The plaintiffs claim they are being coerced into paying increased rent without proper authority.

The plaintiffs, K.V. Thomas and others, are the owners of a building leased to the 1st defendant, M/s ALTAIM. They filed a suit due to non-payment of rent and violations of the lease agreement.

Karollil Sankaran filed a suit against Yes Bank Limited and Nakshathra Agencies. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.

The plaintiffs, led by Siju Aravindan, filed a suit against the defendants including Kanayannur Taluk SNDP Union. The case was dismissed as not pressed by the court.

David Paul filed a petition to restore a suit that was dismissed. The court dismissed the petition for default due to the petitioner's absence and lack of representation.