Government

Fr. Paul Issac is the plaintiff in this case against the Kerala Government and other government officials. The suit was dismissed as not pressed.

The plaintiffs, Danial Varghese and others, claim ownership of a property that has been wrongly classified as government land by the defendants, the State of Kerala and its officials. They seek a declaration of title and corrections in the revenue records.

The petitioner Varghese claims ownership and possession over a property and fears that the respondents are attempting to divert rainwater into his property, which may cause damage. The respondents argue that the water flow into the property is natural and has existed for decades.

This case involves plaintiffs Joshi Paul and Saju T.K. against multiple defendants including government officials and a private individual. The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiffs' absence and failure to present evidence.

The plaintiff, T. K. Lalu, is seeking to fix the boundary between his property and that of the defendants, who include the State of Kerala and others. The case revolves around allegations of inaccuracies in property boundaries established in a resurvey.

Nandakumar A.P. filed a suit against the State of Kerala and others seeking mandatory and perpetual injunction to remove encroachments on a public way that he claims is essential for accessing his property. The defendants include government officials and a private individual who allegedly encroached on the way.

The case involves a plaintiff named Baby who filed a suit against the Kerala State Electricity Board and its officials. The plaintiff was absent during the trial, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.

Moideen Haji is the decree holder, and the Assistant Education Officer is the judgment debtor. The court addressed an execution petition concerning the decree holder's claim.

Pathummakutty is the plaintiff seeking an injunction against the defendants, which include government officials. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent during the hearing.

The petitioners, Safiya and Roubeela, filed a petition under the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act seeking eviction of the Department of Posts and others from a building they claim is required for their own business. The respondents contended that the eviction request was a guise for rent enhancement.