Government

The petitioner is the State of Kerala and the respondent is Vasu Eranchikkal. The case involved a penalty imposed, which has been paid, leading to the closure of the case.

Reena, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Radhakrishnan. P. K and others. The matter was settled between the parties through mediation.

The case involves the State of Kerala as the petitioner against Prakasan and Sreejith regarding the enforcement of a surety penalty. The court ordered the surety to pay a penalty of Rs 2000.

The plaintiff, N. K. Chandran, filed a suit against multiple defendants including the Secretary of Nadapuram Gramapanchayath. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was not present during the hearing.

Dr. Praveenkumar T.K filed an execution petition against the State of Kerala and other respondents. The court heard the case and recorded full satisfaction.

The plaintiff, State Bank of India, is seeking to recover an outstanding education loan amount from the defendants, Sathyavathi Subramani and Subramani A. The defendants defaulted on their loan repayments leading to this suit.

The plaintiff, M/s. Manuelsons Hotel Pvt Ltd, is suing the defendants for a balance amount of ₹2,37,811/- due for accommodation provided during the National Games. The defendants include the District Collector and the State of Kerala, who claim that they have settled the account based on actual occupancy.

M. AbduRahiman filed a suit against the State of Kerala and other officials regarding a matter related to labor and employment. The court has dismissed the suit with both parties bearing their own costs.

This case involves plaintiffs Muhammed Riyas.K.E, Faisal.K.E, and Arifa.K.E against the State of Kerala and its officials regarding a land acquisition dispute. The matter was settled between the plaintiffs and Defendant No.6, leading to the dismissal of the suit.

The plaintiffs, Velayudhan. K. P and K. N. Vijayan, filed a suit against the defendants, including Shri. Subrata. K Mishra and the National Council of Science Museums. The case was dismissed as not pressed, indicating the plaintiffs chose not to pursue it further.