Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 3491 - 3495 of 4243

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Sarojini vs Gopinathan regarding restoration petition

Restoration Petition

Restor.Ptn 3159/2014

Tirur, Malappuram

2015-02-09

0 years, 2 months, 29 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Thekkathuveettil Beepathu vs Parambath Kunhimoideen Haji regarding delivery

Delivery Petition

EP 280/2013

Tirur, Malappuram

2015-02-09

1 year, 2 months, 19 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Moidu-P1 vs Kuttippurathodi Musthafa-R1 regarding unknown

Civil Case

Restor.] 2968/2014

Tirur, Malappuram

2015-02-05

0 years, 3 months, 1 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayisha et al regarding loan recovery

Civil Suit - Recovery of Money

Original Suit No. 351 OF 2014

Tirur

2015-02-05

1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Koloor Hamza et al vs Mundekkat Muhammed Shafi et al regarding lease and rent control

Rent Control

Rent Control Petition No. 17 of 2012

Tirur

2015-02-04

2 years, 11 months, 23 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

42%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 4,243 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 126 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 98 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 83 cases)
Commission Plan (in 79 cases)
Tax receipt (in 70 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1779
Defendant Won: 1249

1249

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

36%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed to pay required batta, resulting in case dismissals for default.

Found in 36 cases (36%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Petitioners were often absent during hearings, leading to dismissals for non-appearance.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many plaintiffs failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Required Notices

Plaintiffs did not appropriately issue notices to respondents, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Petitioner

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Issue Required Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?