Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 3236 - 3240 of 4243

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between E.M.Purushothaman vs Baiju regarding cheque dishonour under Negotiable Instruments Act

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour

S.T. No:33/2015

Tirur

2017-12-21

Approximately 4 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Meleppurath Illathayil Hameed vs Pathumma et al regarding preliminary decree

Not mentioned

FDA 1105/2015

Tirur, Malappuram

2015-08-18

0 years, 4 months, 12 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Abdu Haji vs Mattathu Valappil Beeran Kutty's children et al regarding damages for demolition of compound wall

Civil Suit - Damages

Original Suit No. 156 OF 2013

Tirur

2015-08-18

2 years, 17 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Ramla et al vs Kamalam et al regarding default of payment

Civil Suit

EP 100/2015

Tirur, Malappuram

2015-08-18

0 years, 4 months, 24 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs M.Babu regarding debt recovery

Civil Suit - Debt Recovery

EP 265/2014

Tirur, Malappuram

2015-08-18

0 years, 8 months, 24 days

Dismissed

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

42%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 4,243 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 126 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 98 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 83 cases)
Commission Plan (in 79 cases)
Tax receipt (in 70 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1779
Defendant Won: 1249

1249

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta Fees

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay the required batta fees, resulting in case dismissals for default.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Many cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs not providing sufficient evidence to support their claims.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Absence of Petitioners

Plaintiffs often failed to appear in court, leading to default dismissals of their petitions.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Procedural Steps

Plaintiffs frequently did not take necessary procedural steps, like issuing notices, which led to case dismissals.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta Fees

Lack of Evidence Provided

Absence of Petitioners

Failure to Take Procedural Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?