Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 3121 - 3125 of 3166

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Niramaruthur Service Co-op.Bank Ltd. vs Mammoonhinte purakkal Noushad, Jarakkadavath Saleem, and Puthenkammuvinte purakkal Raheem regarding execution of decree

Execution Petition

KLML130001122012

Tirur, Malappuram

2013-10-22

Dismissed

View Full Details

Case between Secretary vs Hamza Poozhithara et al regarding default judgment

Civil Suit

EP 60/2013

Tirur, Malappuram

2013-10-19

0 years, 7 months, 14 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Secretary vs Ahammedkutty Poozhithara regarding default judgement

Not mentioned

EP 62/2013

Tirur, Malappuram

2013-10-19

0 years, 7 months, 14 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Malappuram Dist.Co-op.Bank Ltd. vs K.Hussain et al regarding debt repayment

Civil Suit

EP 273/2011

Tirur, Malappuram

2013-10-19

2 years, 1 month, 12 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Secretary,Thennala Service Co-op.Bank Ltd. vs Vinod et al regarding default of payment

Civil Suit

EP 298/2011

Tirur, Malappuram

2013-10-19

1 year, 11 months, 11 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 3,166 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 15%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 73 cases)
Commission Report (in 69 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 60 cases)
Tax receipt (in 51 cases)
Agreement (in 43 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1599
Defendant Won: 1075

1075

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

24%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Pay Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary batta, leading to dismissals for default.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence to prove their claims, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Non-Payment and Non-Representation

Dismissals occurred often due to plaintiffs being absent and failing to pay required fees.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Plaintiffs frequently neglected to issue necessary notices to respondents, causing dismissals.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Pay Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Non-Payment and Non-Representation

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?