Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 2681 - 2685 of 3169

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between K.P.O.Kadeeja vs Kavithothu Fireesh Kumar regarding possession petition

Civil Suit - Possession Petition

EP 156/2013

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-08-29

1 year, 1 month, 26 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Secretary vs Cherachamveettil Kattiya kadavath Husain regarding default judgment

Default Judgment

EP 267/2013

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-08-28

0 years, 9 months, 17 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Moideen Haji vs Muhammed Saleem regarding property delivery

Civil Execution Petition

EP 294/2013

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-08-28

0 years, 8 months, 19 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Manager, M/s Popular Vehicles and Services Ltd vs Mohammed Haneefa regarding offence under section 138 of N.I. Act

Criminal Case - Negotiable Instruments Act Offence

ST. No:30/2014

Tirur

2014-08-28

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Abdul Jabbar vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding dishonored cheque under Negotiable Instruments Act

Criminal Case - Offense under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act

S.T. No:36/2014

Tirur

2014-08-28

5 years

Unknown

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

50%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 3,169 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 15%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 73 cases)
Commission Report (in 69 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 60 cases)
Tax receipt (in 51 cases)
Agreement (in 43 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1600
Defendant Won: 1076

1076

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs repeatedly failed to pay necessary court fees, leading to dismissal.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Insufficient evidence regarding the respondent's financial capacity or means to pay the decree often led to dismissals.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Absence of Petitioners

Dismissing cases due to the absence of petitioners when required to appear in court was a frequent issue.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Many cases faced dismissal because proper notice was not issued to respondents, causing procedural lapses.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of Petitioners

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?