Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 266 - 270 of 3166

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between The Secretary Ozhur Service Co-Operative Limited vs Akbarali Thivalappil and Subair Palottil regarding debt recovery

Civil Suit - Debt Recovery

EP/300267/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-07-28

0 years, 7 months, 12 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Shamsudheen vs Sarada et al regarding eviction

Rent Control Petition - Eviction

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 8 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-07-28

2 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ayisha Beevi et al vs Ramanalukkal Yahu regarding eviction

Eviction Case

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 28 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-07-28

Approximately 2 years 11 months

Plaintiffs

View Full Details

Case between Ayisha Beevi et al vs Ramanalukkal Yahu regarding eviction

Eviction under Section 11(3) of the Kerala Building (Lease & Rent) Control Act, 1965

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 29 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-07-28

2 years 11 months 27 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Not available vs Not available regarding settlement

Civil Suit

R.C.P 77/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-07-28

2 years, 0 months, 23 days

Not available

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 3,157 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 15%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 73 cases)
Commission Report (in 69 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 60 cases)
Tax receipt (in 51 cases)
Agreement (in 43 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1598
Defendant Won: 1074

1075

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

24%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Pay Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary batta, leading to dismissals for default.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence to prove their claims, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Non-Payment and Non-Representation

Dismissals occurred often due to plaintiffs being absent and failing to pay required fees.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Plaintiffs frequently neglected to issue necessary notices to respondents, causing dismissals.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Pay Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Non-Payment and Non-Representation

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?