Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 2476 - 2480 of 3169

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between V.P. Santhosh vs Sunil Kumar regarding dishonoured cheque

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 of N.I. Act

S.T. No:31/2014

Tirur

2014-07-09

Approximately 1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between M/s Popular Vehicles and Services Ltd vs Mohammed Haneefa regarding dishonour of cheque

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour

S.T. No:30/2014 (Refiled from ST.183/2013 of J.F.C.M-1, Tirur)

Tirur

2014-08-28

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Abdul Jabbar vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding cheque dishonour

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour

ST No:36/2014

Tirur

2014-08-28

5 years

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Muhammedkutty Haji vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding dishonoured cheque

Criminal Case - Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act

S.T. No:38/2014

Tirur

2014-08-28

5 years 4 months

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Paroor Appu Nair vs Munhakkal Amina et al regarding restoration petition

Restoration Petition

Restor.Pt 983/2014

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-08-16

0 years, 5 months, 4 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

50%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 3,169 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 15%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 73 cases)
Commission Report (in 69 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 60 cases)
Tax receipt (in 51 cases)
Agreement (in 43 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1600
Defendant Won: 1076

1076

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required batta fees, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff in Court

Cases were often dismissed when plaintiffs were absent during court proceedings.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Plaintiffs consistently failed to present sufficient evidence needed to support their claims.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Dismissing cases arose from plaintiffs' failure to issue necessary notices to defendants.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Plaintiff in Court

Lack of Evidence Provided

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?