Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 1971 - 1975 of 4243

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Sasidharan vs Meenakshi et al regarding property delivery

Civil Suit

EP 192/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-10-30

0 years, 2 months, 19 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sulojana et al vs Meenakshi et al regarding property delivery

Civil Execution Petition

EP 193/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-10-30

0 years, 2 months, 19 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Shafi vs Jafar regarding Cheque Dishonour

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour

S.T. No:17/2016

Tirur

2017-10-30

3 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between C.Krishnan kutty vs Koyakutty regarding dishonour of cheque

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour (Section 138 N.I. Act)

S.T. No:51/2016

Tirur

2017-10-30

1 year, 5 months, 8 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Jaisal et al vs. Accomplish Marketing Company et al regarding non-repayment of pledged gold ornaments

Civil Suit - Recovery

ORIGINAL PETITION (Pauper) No. 105 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-10-28

1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

42%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 4,243 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 126 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 98 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 83 cases)
Commission Plan (in 79 cases)
Tax receipt (in 70 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1779
Defendant Won: 1249

1249

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

41%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary fees, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 41 cases (41%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner in Court

Many cases were dismissed because the petitioner did not appear in court when required.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Provide Evidence

Lack of evidence supporting claims or proving financial means resulted in case dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Lack of Required Documentation

Dismissing petitions due to the absence of necessary documents needed for case proceedings.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Petitioner in Court

Failure to Provide Evidence

Lack of Required Documentation

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?