Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 1471 - 1475 of 4243

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Yunus vs Muhammad Shareef regarding restoration petition

Restoration Petition

Restoration Petition 3021/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-04-12

0 years, 3 months, 29 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Raramkandath Aboobacker et al vs Raramkandath Jouharali et al regarding money realization

Money Realization Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 306 OF 2017

Tirur

2018-04-12

Less than 1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Raramkandath Aboobacker et al vs Raramkandath Usman Koya et al regarding money realization

Civil Suit - Money Realization

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 307 OF 2017

Tirur

2018-04-12

Approximately 1 year 12 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Mangalam Service Co-operative Bank Ltd vs Palliyal Valappil Soumini regarding debt recovery

Debt Recovery - Execution Petition

EP 41/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-04-12

1 year, 1 month, 20 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Muhammad Shareef et al vs Yunas regarding restoration of suit

Civil Suit

EP 240/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-04-12

0 years, 5 months, 4 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

42%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 4,243 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 126 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 98 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 83 cases)
Commission Plan (in 79 cases)
Tax receipt (in 70 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1779
Defendant Won: 1249

1249

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

23%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Many petitions were dismissed for default as plaintiffs failed to pay the required batta fees.

Found in 23 cases (23%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Petitions were frequently dismissed due to the absence of the petitioners during court proceedings.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs often failed to present sufficient evidence to support their claims, leading to dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Required Notices

Many cases were dismissed for lack of action in issuing necessary notices to defendants.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Petitioner

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Issue Required Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?