| Niyamam AI

Displaying 14141 - 14145 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Vazhanthodi Saidalavi vs Thayyil Ramla et al regarding restoration of suit

Restoration Petition

Restor.Ptn 370/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2016-04-07

0 years, 2 months, 17 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Neeliyat Hamza Haji vs Kundil Shafi et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

Original Suit No. 117 OF 2016

Tirur

2016-04-05

Not mentioned

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Leela et al vs Faizal regarding restoration petition

Restoration Petition

Restor.Ptn 216/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2016-04-04

0 years, 2 months, 24 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Saidu Mohaidheen @ Moideenkutty vs Kuniyil Ismail et al regarding restoration petition

Restoration Petition

Restor.Ptn/3541/2015

Tirur, Malappuram

2016-04-02

0 years, 3 months, 12 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between P. Mohamed Rafi vs Moideenkutty regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

Original Suit No. 106 of 2016

Tirur

2016-04-01

Not mentioned

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

36%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required fees or batta, leading to case dismissal for default.

Found in 36 cases (36%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Cases were dismissed due to insufficient evidence demonstrating the financial means of the respondents.

Found in 29 cases (29%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioners in Court

Several petitions were dismissed due to the petitioner's absence during court proceedings.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Procedural Steps

Many cases were dismissed because plaintiffs did not take necessary procedural steps to advance their petitions.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment

Lack of Evidence Provided

Absence of Petitioners in Court

Failure to Take Procedural Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?