| Niyamam AI

Displaying 14046 - 14050 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Arshad P.P. vs Mahindra and Mahindra Finance Services Ltd. et al regarding restoration petition

Restoration Petition

Restoration Petition 1028/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2016-09-26

0 years, 6 months, 3 days

Petitioner

View Full Details

Case between Abdulla vs Muraleedharan regarding eviction

Rent Control Petition - Eviction

RCP. 48/2015

Tirur

2016-09-22

1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Abdulla vs Muraleedharan regarding fair rent fixation

Rent Control Petition - Fair Rent Fixation

Rent Control Petition No. 49 of 2015

Tirur

2016-09-22

1 year 4 months 26 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Moideen Haji vs Government Education Officials and Others regarding arrears of rent settlement

Civil Suit - Arrears of Rent

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 453 OF 2014

Tirur

2017-11-24

3 years

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Yogakshemam Loans Ltd. et al vs Muhammed Rasheed et al regarding loan recovery

Civil Suit - Money Recovery

Original Suit No. 118 OF 2015

Tirur

2016-09-24

1 year 1 month 2 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

34%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta Fees

Plaintiffs frequently failed due to not paying the required batta fees for proceeding with their cases.

Found in 34 cases (34%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioner in Court

Petitioners often failed their cases due to their absence during court proceedings.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Plaintiffs frequently failed to take required procedural steps, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta Fees

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of Petitioner in Court

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?