| Niyamam AI

Displaying 13126 - 13130 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Canara Bank vs Sunil.A. regarding arrest and detention

Criminal Case - Arrest and Detention

EP 14/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-09-23

0 years, 7 months, 30 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Federal Bank Ltd. vs N.Rabiya regarding debt settlement

Debt Settlement - Civil Case

EP 24/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-09-23

0 years, 7 months, 10 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kunnamkulam Financing Company Ltd. vs Sidheeq regarding sale confirmation

Civil Suit - Sale Confirmation

EP 71/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-09-23

1 year, 7 months, 19 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Peringottukara Namboothiri Yoga Kshema Sabha vs P.K.Gopinathan regarding default judgment

Civil Suit

EP 169/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-09-23

1 year, 2 months, 11 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Peringottukara Namboothiri Yoga Kshema Sabha vs P.K.Gopinathan regarding enforcement proceeding

Enforcement Proceeding

EP 171/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-09-23

1 year, 2 months, 11 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

31%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed to pay necessary fees for proceeding, leading to dismissal of their petitions.

Found in 31 cases (31%) High Impact

Absence of Evidence

Plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Plaintiffs neglected to take necessary procedural steps in their petitions, causing dismissals for default.

Found in 21 cases (21%) Medium Impact

Non-Representation by Plaintiff

Cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs not appearing or representing themselves in court.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of Evidence

Failure to Take Steps

Non-Representation by Plaintiff

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?