Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 1236 - 1240 of 4243

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Erachampattu Muhammed Kassim et al vs M.Sreenivasan regarding rent control petition

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 90 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-11-02

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between The Secretary Ozhur Service Co-operative Bank vs Naushad et al regarding EP 56/2018

Civil Suit - Execution Petition

EP 56/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-11-01

0 years, 8 months, 3 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Hassainar et al vs Valiyakath Muhammed's children et al regarding Partition

Civil Suit - Partition

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 89 OF 2015

Tirur

2018-10-31

3 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kariyil Surendran vs Accomplish Marketing Company (Pvt) Ltd. et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit - Money Recovery

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 89 OF 2017

Tirur

2018-10-31

1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Jayaraj vs Pathekkara Parambil deceased Narayanan's Children et al regarding partition

Civil Suit - Partition

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 100 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-10-31

2 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

42%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 4,243 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 126 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 98 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 83 cases)
Commission Plan (in 79 cases)
Tax receipt (in 70 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1779
Defendant Won: 1249

1249

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

28%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay the required batta, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of critical evidence to support claims resulted in dismissals of multiple petitions.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Failure to Issue Notice

Repeated failures to properly issue notices to respondents contributed to dismissals.

Found in 23 cases (23%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Many cases were dismissed due to the petitioner's absence during hearings.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Issue Notice

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?