Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 901 - 905 of 3169

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Jaisal et al vs. Accomplish Marketing Company et al regarding non-repayment of pledged gold ornaments

Civil Suit - Recovery

ORIGINAL PETITION (Pauper) No. 105 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-10-28

1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Peringottukara Namboothiri Yogakshema Sabha et al vs Nelson et al regarding money realization

Civil Suit - Realization of Money

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 159 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-10-28

1 year 8 months 8 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Leela vs Asokan regarding eviction

Civil Suit - Eviction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 174 OF 2015

Tirur

2017-10-28

2 years 3 months 27 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kuttipparambil Eanikkutty Haji et al vs State of Kerala regarding property rights

Civil Suit - Mandatory Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No.241 OF 2017

Tirur

2017-10-28

19 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sreekandan Nair et al vs Erampalliyil Siyad et al regarding an injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 357 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-10-28

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

50%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 3,169 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 15%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 73 cases)
Commission Report (in 69 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 60 cases)
Tax receipt (in 51 cases)
Agreement (in 43 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1600
Defendant Won: 1076

1076

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

28%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiff failed to pay necessary fees (batta), leading to case dismissal for default.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiff's failure to provide evidence regarding respondent’s means resulted in case dismissal.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

No Steps Taken in Case

Plaintiff did not take necessary steps to proceed, resulting in dismissal.

Found in 21 cases (21%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Case dismissed due to the petitioner's absence in court during proceedings.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

No Steps Taken in Case

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?