Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 856 - 860 of 3169

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Peringottukara Namboodiri Yoga Kshema Sabha vs E.Muhammed Musthafa regarding settlement in adalath

Unknown

EP 30/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-11-13

1 year, 10 months, 7 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank vs Peranthan Kummarampil regarding default enquiry

Civil Suit

EP 68/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-11-13

0 years, 8 months, 10 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank No.F.770 vs Husain Chenganakatil regarding loan closure

Civil Suit - Loan Closure

EP 43/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-11-13

0 years, 8 months, 12 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Peringottukara Namboodiri Yoga Kshemam Sabha vs E.Muhammed Musthafa regarding settlement in Adalath

Unknown

EP 74/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-11-13

1 year, 10 months, 7 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Peringottukara Namboodiri Yoga Kshema Sabha et al vs E.Muhammed Musthafa regarding settlement in Adalath

Civil Suit

EP 73/2016

Tirur,Malappuram

2017-11-13

1 year 10 months 7 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

50%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 3,169 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 15%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 73 cases)
Commission Report (in 69 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 60 cases)
Tax receipt (in 51 cases)
Agreement (in 43 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1600
Defendant Won: 1076

1076

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

32%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Provide Evidence

Plaintiffs often failed to present adequate evidence related to the means of the respondents.

Found in 32 cases (32%) High Impact

Non-Payment of Batta

Frequent defaults were noted due to non-payment of batta required for proceeding with the cases.

Found in 27 cases (27%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Cases were dismissed when the petitioner did not appear in court, affecting their chance for success.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Lack of Necessary Documents

Dismissals occurred frequently due to plaintiffs not producing necessary documents required by the court.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Provide Evidence

Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Petitioner

Lack of Necessary Documents

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?