Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 456 - 460 of 3169

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Melepurath Illathiyil Hameed et al vs Pathumma et al regarding property dispute

Civil Suit - Property Dispute

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No. 1088 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-03-22

4 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Panayankandi Mohan Das vs Accomplish Marketing Private Ltd. et al regarding money realization

Civil Suit - Realization of money

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 390 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-03-22

2 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Abdurahiman vs Mohammedkutty et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit - Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 279 OF 2017

Tirur

2018-03-21

1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kunnath Avulan kutty Haji vs Parappathiyil Muhammedali et al regarding property possession

Civil Suit - Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 111 OF 2014

Tirur

2018-03-21

Approximately 4 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kunnamkulam Financing Company Limited vs Sakkariya regarding debt recovery

Debt Recovery

EP 102/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-03-21

0 years, 11 months, 11 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

50%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 3,169 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 15%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 73 cases)
Commission Report (in 69 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 60 cases)
Tax receipt (in 51 cases)
Agreement (in 43 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1600
Defendant Won: 1076

1076

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

19%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Numerous petitions were dismissed for failure to pay required fees (batta) for processing cases.

Found in 19 cases (19%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many cases failed due to insufficient evidence demonstrating the financial means of the respondents to pay debts.

Found in 18 cases (18%) High Impact

Absence of Petitioners in Court

Cases were dismissed when petitioners failed to appear for hearings, leading to defaults.

Found in 17 cases (17%) High Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Petitions often failed due to lack of action taken to issue necessary notices to the respondents.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of Petitioners in Court

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?